There are always stories where teachers would sacrifice themselves in the wake of disasters to ensure the safety of his/her students. And this time round, when the Sichuan earthquake happened, many such stories surface out. From the news, we hear of how teachers being killed when ensuring the safety of their students.
However in this report (sorry, this was in Chinese only), we can see the complete opposite- that of the teacher running first, not caring about his student. For the benefit of those who don’t understand Chinese, the teacher in the report had run out of the classroom first, leaving his students behind, when the earthquake started. The guy then bragged about his escape from the earthquake in some forum. The worst thing however came in the last line of his post in which it translates roughly to “In this situation, I would only sacrifice my safety and life for my daughter only. I would not risk my life for other people like that, including my own mother.”
This triggered a huge negative response from the China blogosphere and the teacher was scolded and criticized heavily for not caring about his student and was questioned on his suitability to teach (Out of curiosity, he is a graduate from one of the top universities of China. – a point that was picked up by China bloggers who called him an insult to his school). His answer: There was no official rule that a teacher must save his students in the wake of an earthquake.
It is only human nature that when there is a disaster, people would start fleeing for their lives without caring for other people. After all, this is a mechanism for survival.
However, there are some situations in which these instincts are ignored for some higher principles. For example, we have heard of how mothers have used themselves as a human shield in car crashes so that their child is protected or how people fight impossible battles so that others can escape.
With these two sometimes opposing voices in our head, people can choose to listen to either one and their decision can be understood. So why were the people so disappointed then? I guess this all boils down to how people perceive teachers. For me, I feel that teachers serve a role as a surrogate parents. Not only do the teacher teach our kids, they would, in our mind, have to take care of them as well and safety of the kids is a teacher’s responsibility as well. And instinctively, we would want the teacher to treat our kids as his or her own as well. However, this is not always the case
In Singapore, at least, I know that teaching is not exactly the ideal profession for other people. Do you know how the NIE (National Institute of Education) is viewed as for the JC people for my time? Well, to put it bluntly, it was a dumping ground for the students with poor performance in their exams, save for those who really desire to teach. So you see, the bulk of the teachers are essentially forced into their profession. Some then would really discover the joys in teaching and really become good teachers. But what about those who were forced and then still feel lousy about teaching? Then they would just treat it like their job and would not do a thing outside their job scope. Of course I cannot say how many of them are like that but they definitely exist. And so it is not so puzzling that this teacher ran away. Hey, it is only his job. Why should he endanger himself needlessly so that other can survive? After all, it is not his responsibility.
So is he right or is he wrong? I guess, he is human to run away and can be forgiven. But to brag about it is just too crass. I guess the only thing at fault is that he was too human and that society’s perspective of teaching is just too narrow.